数据库
首页 > 数据库> > 记一次SQL优化

记一次SQL优化

作者:互联网

昨天(2022-7-22)上线了我的一个功能,测试环境数据量较小,问题不大,但是上生产之后,直接卡死了,然后就开始了这么一次SQL优化,这里记录一下。

不太方便透露公司的表结构,这里我自己建了几张表,模拟一下就可以了。

肯定有杠精要说表可以不这样设计了,但是事实现在系统就是这样设计的,如果想改动表设计,影响面就太大了(我们急着上线哦)。当然,本文的后面也会给出修改设计的方案,以达到更优解。

1. 创建表

进货单表:

CREATE TABLE `purchase_order` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT '主键自增id',
  `purchase_time` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT '进货时间',
  `purchase_pre_unit_price` decimal(10,2) unsigned zerofill NOT NULL COMMENT '进货预订单价(元/kg)',
  `purchase_weight` decimal(10,2) unsigned zerofill NOT NULL COMMENT '进货重量(kg)',
  `purchase_bill_no` varchar(255) NOT NULL COMMENT '进货单号',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=62181 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COMMENT='进货单';

进货结算单表:

CREATE TABLE `settlement_voucher` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT '自增ID',
  `purchase_bill_no` varchar(512) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT '进货单号',
  `settlement_bill_no` varchar(64) NOT NULL COMMENT '结算单号',
  `unit_price` decimal(10,2) unsigned zerofill NOT NULL COMMENT '实际结算单价(元/kg)',
  `settlement_weight` decimal(10,2) unsigned zerofill NOT NULL COMMENT '实际结算重量(kg)',
  `cut_off_time` datetime DEFAULT NULL ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP COMMENT '结算时间',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `idx_settlement_bill_no` (`settlement_bill_no`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB AUTO_INCREMENT=63288 DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COMMENT='进货结算单';

发票表:

CREATE TABLE `invoice` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT '主键ID',
  `invoice_code` varchar(255) NOT NULL COMMENT '发票代码',
  `invoice_number` varchar(255) NOT NULL COMMENT '发票号码',
  `pay_amount` decimal(10,2) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT '发票金额',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `idx_invoice_number` (`invoice_number`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COMMENT='发票表';

发票-结算单关联表:

CREATE TABLE `settlement_invoice_relation` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT COMMENT '主键ID',
  `invoice_code` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT '发票代码',
  `invoice_number` varchar(255) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT '发票号码',
  `settlement_bill_no` varchar(64) DEFAULT NULL COMMENT '结算单号',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),
  KEY `idx_settlement_bill_no` (`settlement_bill_no`),
  KEY `idx_invoice_number` (`invoice_number`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COMMENT='发票-结算单关联表';

以上是我自己创建的几张表,先介绍一下这几张表的关系:

2. 需求

现在需要以进货结算单表(settlement_voucher)查询出一个列表:

当然,实际当时的那个需求,列表字段比这多,查询条件也比这多......

3. 给表插入数据

先给货单表(purchase_order)和进货结算单表(settlement_voucher)各自插入10万条数据,我这里使用了存储过程:

begin
declare i int;		
declare purchase_weight decimal(10,2);
declare unit_price decimal(10,2);
declare purchase_bill_no varchar(255);
declare settlement_bill_no varchar(255);
set i=0;
while i<100000 do		
	select ROUND(RAND()*100,2) into purchase_weight from dual;
	select ROUND(RAND()*10,2) into unit_price from dual;
	select CONCAT('purchase-',LPAD(i,8,'0')) into purchase_bill_no from dual;
	select CONCAT('settlement-',LPAD(i,8,'0')) into settlement_bill_no from dual;

	-- 插入进货单表,进货时间随机生成
	insert into purchase_order(purchase_time,purchase_pre_unit_price,purchase_weight,purchase_bill_no) 
	select (DATE_ADD(NOW(),  INTERVAL  FLOOR(1 - (RAND() * 864000))   SECOND )),
		unit_price,purchase_weight,purchase_bill_no from dual;
	-- 插入结算单表,结算时间随机生成
	insert into settlement_voucher(purchase_bill_no,settlement_bill_no,unit_price,settlement_weight,cut_off_time)
	select purchase_bill_no,settlement_bill_no,unit_price,purchase_weight,
	(DATE_ADD(NOW(),  INTERVAL  FLOOR(1 - (RAND() * 864000))   SECOND )) from dual;
set i=i+1;		
end while;
end

调用存储过程生成数据:

call pre();

生成之后需要随机改几条数据,模拟一个进货单可以对应多个进货结算单,以及一个进货结算单可以对应多个进货单两种情况(这样数据更真实一点)。

一个进货单可以对应多个进货结算单的情况就不模拟了,这种情况其实对这次查询的影响并不大。

一个进货结算单可以对应多个进货单的情况:

再创建一些发票数据和结算单-发票关联数据,需要体现多对多的关系:

insert into invoice(invoice_code,invoice_number,pay_amount)
VALUES
('111111','1111100','1000'),
('111112','1111101','1001'),
('111113','1111102','1002'),
('111114','1111103','1003'),
('111115','1111104','1004'),
('111116','1111105','1005'),
('111117','1111106','1006'),
('111118','1111107','1007'),
('111119','1111108','1008'),
('111110','1111109','1009');

INSERT into settlement_invoice_relation(invoice_code,invoice_number,settlement_bill_no)
VALUES
('111111','1111100','settlement-00000000'),
('111112','1111101','settlement-00000000'),
('111113','1111102','settlement-00000000'),
('111114','1111103','settlement-00000004'),
('111114','1111103','settlement-00000006'),
('111114','1111103','settlement-00000030'),
('111116','1111105','settlement-00000041'),
('111117','1111106','settlement-00000041'),
('111118','1111107','settlement-00000043');

4. 开始根据需求写SQL

优化第一步,当然是想让产品经理去掉一些查询条件,避免进货单表和进货结算表关联了,但是你懂的。。。。。。

这里就以进货时间为条件查询为例(因为主要就是进货单和进货结算单关联导致慢查询),记得需求哦,就是一个进货结算单可能对应多个进货单,只要有其中一个进货单在时间范围内,就需要查询出这条进货结算单

还有:我上面创建的表中索引也模拟了当时优化之前的索引......

4.1 第一版

select 
	GROUP_CONCAT(po.purchase_time) as 进货时间,
	AVG(IFNULL(po.purchase_pre_unit_price,0)) as 进货均价,
	t.settlement_bill_no as 结算单号,
	AVG(IFNULL(t.unit_price,0)) as 结算均价,
	any_value(t.cut_off_time) as 结算时间,
	any_value(invoice_tmp.invoice_code) as 发票代码,
	any_value(invoice_tmp.invoice_number) as 发票号码
from settlement_voucher t
left join purchase_order po on FIND_IN_SET(po.purchase_bill_no,t.purchase_bill_no)>0
left join (
	select sir.settlement_bill_no,
				 GROUP_CONCAT(i.invoice_number) invoice_number,
				 GROUP_CONCAT(i.invoice_code) invoice_code 
	from settlement_invoice_relation sir, invoice i 
	where sir.invoice_code = i.invoice_code and sir.invoice_number = i.invoice_number 
	group by sir.settlement_bill_no
) invoice_tmp on invoice_tmp.settlement_bill_no = t.settlement_bill_no
where 1=1 
-- and t.settlement_bill_no='settlement-00000000'
and EXISTS(select 1 from purchase_order po1 where FIND_IN_SET(po1.purchase_bill_no,t.purchase_bill_no)>0
	and po1.purchase_time >='2022-07-01 00:00:00' 
)
and EXISTS(select 1 from purchase_order po1 where FIND_IN_SET(po1.purchase_bill_no,t.purchase_bill_no)>0
	and po1.purchase_time <='2022-07-23 23:59:59' 
)
group by t.settlement_bill_no;

第一版SQL当时在本地环境执行是用了5秒左右,此时就已经意识到问题了,这别说上生产了,就是在测试环境都得挂掉。

但是看看我在自己的垃圾服务器(双核4G)上跑这条SQL吧,是根本执行不出来的(虽然公司服务器好一些,但是生产环境确实卡死了):

当时就还没没看执行计划,一眼看去,这个SQL中用到了FIND_IN_SET,肯定是不会走索引的,建了索引也没用,也就是主要是进货单表(purchase_order)和进货结算单表settlement_voucher关联会很慢,毕竟他们是多对多的关系,再加上这恶心的需求。所以现在想想该怎么才能不用 FIND_IN_SET

对,吃饭期间,突发奇想:我应该可以把进货结算单表拆成一个临时表,如果进货结算单表对应了5个进货单,我就把进货结算单拆成5条数据,这五条数据除了进货单号不一样,其他字段都 一样,这样就可以不用FIND_IN_SET了。

说干就干,于是有了下面第二版SQL。

4.2 第二版

向把进货结算单表拆分成上面说的临时表,需要添加一个表:

CREATE TABLE `incre_table` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`)
) ENGINE=InnoDB DEFAULT CHARSET=utf8 COMMENT='用于分割进货结算单表';
-- 注意:这里一个进货结算单对应多少个进货单,这里就要依次插入多少条数据,我这里10条 就够用了
insert into incre_table(id) VALUES(1);
insert into incre_table(id) VALUES(2);
insert into incre_table(id) VALUES(3);
insert into incre_table(id) VALUES(4);
insert into incre_table(id) VALUES(5);
insert into incre_table(id) VALUES(6);
insert into incre_table(id) VALUES(7);
insert into incre_table(id) VALUES(8);
insert into incre_table(id) VALUES(9);
insert into incre_table(id) VALUES(10);

先来看看怎么把一条进货结算单数据拆分成多条:

select 
	sv.cut_off_time,
	sv.settlement_bill_no,
	sv.unit_price,
	sv.settlement_weight,
	SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX(sv.purchase_bill_no,',',it.id),',',-1) purchase_bill_no
from settlement_voucher sv
RIGHT JOIN incre_table it on it.id<=(LENGTH(sv.purchase_bill_no) - LENGTH(REPLACE(sv.purchase_bill_no,',','')) + 1)
where sv.settlement_bill_no='settlement-00000000';

来解释一下这个骚操作:

这套SQL执行的结果就是:

综合起来,就写好了第二版SQL:

select 
	GROUP_CONCAT(po.purchase_time) as 进货时间,
	AVG(IFNULL(po.purchase_pre_unit_price,0)) as 进货均价,
	t.settlement_bill_no as 结算单号,
	AVG(IFNULL(t.unit_price,0)) as 结算均价,
	any_value(t.cut_off_time) as 结算时间,
	any_value(invoice_tmp.invoice_code) as 发票代码,
	any_value(invoice_tmp.invoice_number) as 发票号码
from (
	select 
		sv.cut_off_time,
		sv.settlement_bill_no,
		sv.unit_price,
		sv.settlement_weight,
		SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX(sv.purchase_bill_no,',',it.id),',',-1) purchase_bill_no
	from settlement_voucher sv
	RIGHT JOIN incre_table it on it.id<=(LENGTH(sv.purchase_bill_no) - LENGTH(REPLACE(sv.purchase_bill_no,',','')) + 1)
) t
left join purchase_order po on po.purchase_bill_no = t.purchase_bill_no
left join (
	select sir.settlement_bill_no,
				 GROUP_CONCAT(i.invoice_number) invoice_number,
				 GROUP_CONCAT(i.invoice_code) invoice_code 
	from settlement_invoice_relation sir, invoice i 
	where sir.invoice_code = i.invoice_code and sir.invoice_number = i.invoice_number 
	group by sir.settlement_bill_no
) invoice_tmp on invoice_tmp.settlement_bill_no = t.settlement_bill_no
where 1=1 
 -- and t.settlement_bill_no='settlement-00000000'
and po.purchase_time >='2022-07-01 00:00:00' 
and po.purchase_time <='2022-07-23 23:59:59' 
group by t.settlement_bill_no;

测试查询数据结果肯定是没有问题的哦!!!

好的,到这里终于把所有用到FIND_IN_SET的地方去掉了,这时看索引就有意义了!

看看执行计划吧:

阿西巴,一堆的全表扫描,看看上面第二版SQL,发现进货表(purchase_order)的purchase_bill_no字段是应该走索引的,按道理这个字段一般设计表的时候就应该已经加索引了,但是我以为只是我以为,它确实没加索引,好的,那就给它加上索引吧:

create index idx_purchase_bill_no on purchase_order(purchase_bill_no);

加完是这个索引后,再看看执行计划:

purchase_order表的purchase_bill_no已经走了索引,但是settlement_invoice_relation咋不走索引,它是有两个索引的。。。。。。

再看看在我的垃圾服务器上执行,看能不能执行出来:

好了,为了让settlement_invoice_relation表的查询也走索引,开始下一轮的SQL优化

4.3 第三版

就不在下面去聚合获取invoice_codeinvoice_number了,在上面来聚合,至于要以这两个字段作为查询条件,那可以把下面这条SQL再包一层,作为一个临时表再查询一遍,这里就不演示了

select 
	GROUP_CONCAT(po.purchase_time) as 进货时间,
	AVG(IFNULL(po.purchase_pre_unit_price,0)) as 进货均价,
	t.settlement_bill_no as 结算单号,
	AVG(IFNULL(t.unit_price,0)) as 结算均价,
	any_value(t.cut_off_time) as 结算时间,
	GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT invoice_tmp.invoice_code) as 发票代码,
	GROUP_CONCAT(DISTINCT invoice_tmp.invoice_number) as 发票号码
from (
	select 
		sv.cut_off_time,
		sv.settlement_bill_no,
		sv.unit_price,
		sv.settlement_weight,
		SUBSTRING_INDEX(SUBSTRING_INDEX(sv.purchase_bill_no,',',it.id),',',-1) purchase_bill_no
	from settlement_voucher sv
	RIGHT JOIN incre_table it on it.id<=(LENGTH(sv.purchase_bill_no) - LENGTH(REPLACE(sv.purchase_bill_no,',','')) + 1)
) t
left join purchase_order po on po.purchase_bill_no = t.purchase_bill_no
left join (
	select sir.settlement_bill_no,
				 i.invoice_number,
				 i.invoice_code 
	from settlement_invoice_relation sir, invoice i 
	where sir.invoice_code = i.invoice_code and sir.invoice_number = i.invoice_number 
) invoice_tmp on invoice_tmp.settlement_bill_no = t.settlement_bill_no
where 1=1 
 -- and t.settlement_bill_no='settlement-00000000'
and po.purchase_time >='2022-07-01 00:00:00' 
and po.purchase_time <='2022-07-23 23:59:59' 
group by t.settlement_bill_no;

再看看执行计划:

这时,基本优化结束,再看看在我的垃圾服务器上跑出的结果:

到这里,基本上生产上是可以在三秒以内查询出来了,本次SQL优化就到此结束了!!!

但是,其实还是可以继续优化的,但是设计到系统改的地方比较多了,影响面比较大,这里就说一下思路,暂时不能实践:

可以把进货单表purchase_order和进货结算单表settlement_voucher之间,建立一个中间表,实现多对多的关系,再加以索引,应该会更快,而且可以一劳永逸,以后这种关联都会比较方便了!

标签:purchase,一次,no,bill,进货,invoice,SQL,settlement,优化
来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/fanchengmeng/p/16511121.html