机器学习算法系列(5)模型融合
作者:互联网
一、算法原理
模型融合:Voting(投票法)、Blending(线性混合)、Stacking(堆叠)。
模型融合,不是说随意的融合能够达到好的效果。进行融合时,所需集成个体应该好而不同。好指的是个体学习器的性能要好,不同指的是个体模型的类别不同。
(1)Voting
这里举个西瓜书的例子,在介绍例子之前,首先提前介绍简单投票法,以分类问题为例,就是每个分类器对样例进行投票,哪个类别得到的票数最多的就是融合后模型的结果。
在上面的例子中,采用的就是简单的投票法。图b各个模型输出都一样,因此没有什么效果。图c每个分类器的精度只有33%,融合后反而更糟。也就是说,想要模型融合有效果,个体学习器要有一定的准确率,并且要有多样性,学习器之间具有差异,即好而不同。
(2)Stacking
(3)Blending
第一步:把trian先分成两部分,比如70%的数据作为newtrain,剩下30%的数据作为validation。
第二步:第一层,使用newtrain训练多个模型,然后去预测validation的label。
第三步:第二层,使用validation在第一层训模型上的预测结果做为新特征继续训练第二层的模型。
第四步:使用test,带入第一层模型训练预测得到预测值,把预测值当做新的特征带入第二层模型进行训练,得到最终结果。
二、算法案例
#导入库
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
import matplotlib.pyplot as plt
import warnings
warnings.filterwarnings("ignore")#忽略警告
%matplotlib inline
#每次运行代码时设置相同的seed
SEED = 222
np.random.seed(SEED)
df = pd.read_csv('input.csv')
df.head()
1.数据预处理
y = 1*(df.cand_pty_affiliation == 'REP')
X = df.drop(['cand_pty_affiliation'],axis = 1)
X = pd.get_dummies(X,sparse = True)
X.drop(X.columns[X.std() == 0],axis = 1,inplace = True)
#标签分布
df.cand_pty_affiliation.value_counts(normalize = True).plot(kind = 'bar',title = 'Share of No.donations')
plt.show()
2.构建模型
#数据集切分,test_size = 0.95为了加快模型速度
from sklearn.model_selection import train_test_split
xtrain,xtest,ytrain,ytest = train_test_split(X,y,test_size = 0.95,random_state = SEED)
(1)模型融合
#导入库
from sklearn.svm import SVC,LinearSVC
from sklearn.naive_bayes import GaussianNB
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier,GradientBoostingClassifier
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
from sklearn.neighbors import KNeighborsClassifier
from sklearn.neural_network import MLPClassifier
from sklearn.kernel_approximation import Nystroem
from sklearn.kernel_approximation import RBFSampler
from sklearn.pipeline import make_pipeline
from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score
#写好模型训练、预测、评分的函数
def get_models():
nb = GaussianNB()
svc = SVC(C = 100,probability = True)
knn = KNeighborsClassifier(n_neighbors = 3)
lr = LogisticRegression(C = 100,random_state = SEED)
nn = MLPClassifier((80,10),early_stopping = False,random_state = SEED)
gb = GradientBoostingClassifier(n_estimators = 10,random_state = SEED)
rf = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators = 10,max_features = 3,random_state = SEED)
models = {'svm':svc,'knn':knn,'naive':nb,'mlp-nn':nn,'random forest':rf,'gbm':gb,'logisitic':lr}
return models
def train_predict(model_list):
P = np.zeros((ytest.shape[0],len(model_list)))
P = pd.DataFrame(P)
print('Fitting models.')
cols = list()
for i,(name,m) in enumerate(models.items()):
print('%s...'% name,end = '',flush = False)
m.fit(xtrain,ytrain)
P.iloc[:,i] = m.predict_proba(xtest)[:,1]
cols.append(name)
print('done')
P.columns = cols
print('Done.\n')
return P
def score_models(P,y):
print('Scoring models.')
for m in P.columns:
score = roc_auc_score(y,P.loc[:,m])
print('%-26s:%.3f'%(m,score))
print('Done.\n')
%%time
models = get_models()
P = train_predict(models)
score_models(P,ytest)
#简单的平均法模型融合
print("Ensemble ROC-AUC score: %.3f" % roc_auc_score(ytest,P.mean(axis=1)))
#画roc_curve线模板
from sklearn.metrics import roc_curve
def plot_roc_curve(ytest, P_base_learners, P_ensemble, labels, ens_label):
plt.figure(figsize=(10, 8))
plt.plot([0, 1], [0, 1], 'k--')
cm = [plt.cm.rainbow(i)
for i in np.linspace(0, 1.0, P_base_learners.shape[1] + 1)]
for i in range(P_base_learners.shape[1]):
p = P_base_learners[:, i]
fpr, tpr, _ = roc_curve(ytest, p)
plt.plot(fpr, tpr, label=labels[i], c=cm[i + 1])
fpr, tpr, _ = roc_curve(ytest, P_ensemble)
plt.plot(fpr, tpr, label=ens_label, c=cm[0])
plt.xlabel('False positive rate')
plt.ylabel('True positive rate')
plt.title('ROC curve')
plt.legend(frameon=False)
plt.show()
plot_roc_curve(ytest, P.values, P.mean(axis=1), list(P.columns), "ensemble")
(2)Blending
base_learners = get_models()
meta_learner = GradientBoostingClassifier(n_estimators = 1000,
loss = 'exponential',
max_features = 4,
max_depth = 3,
subsample = 0.5,
learning_rate = 0.005,
random_state = SEED)
xtrain_base,xpred_base,ytrain_base,ypred_base = train_test_split(xtrain,ytrain,test_size = 0.5,random_state = SEED)
def train_base_learners(base_learners,inp,out,verbose=True):
if verbose: print("Fitting models.")
for i, (name,m) in enumerate(base_learners.items()):
if verbose: print("%s..." % name, end=" ", flush=False)
m.fit(inp,out)
if verbose: print("done")
def predict_base_learners(pred_base_learners,inp,verbose=True):
P = np.zeros((inp.shape[0], len(pred_base_learners)))
if verbose: print("Generating base learner predictions.")
for i, (name, m) in enumerate(pred_base_learners.items()):
if verbose: print("%s..." % name, end=" ", flush=False)
p = m.predict_proba(inp)
# With two classes, need only predictions for one class
P[:, i] = p[:, 1]
if verbose: print("done")
return P
%%time
train_base_learners(base_learners,xtrain_base,ytrain_base)
P_base = predict_base_learners(base_learners, xpred_base)
%%time
meta_learner.fit(P_base,ypred_base)
def ensemble_predict(base_learners, meta_learner,inp,verbose = True):
P_pred = predict_base_learners(base_learners,inp,verbose = verbose)
return P_pred, meta_learner.predict_proba(P_pred)[:,1]
%%time
P_pred,p = ensemble_predict(base_learners,meta_learner,xtest)
print("\nEnsemble ROC-AUC score: %.3f" % roc_auc_score(ytest,p))
(3)Stacking
from sklearn.base import clone
def stacking(base_learners,meta_learner,X,y,generator):
"""Simple training routine for stacking."""
# Train final base learners for test time
print("Fitting final base learners...", end="")
train_base_learners(base_learners,X,y,verbose=False)
print("done")
# Generate predictions for training meta learners
# Outer loop:
print("Generating cross-validated predictions...")
cv_preds,cv_y = [],[]
for i,(train_idx, test_idx) in enumerate(generator.split(X)):
fold_xtrain, fold_ytrain = X[train_idx, :], y[train_idx]
fold_xtest, fold_ytest = X[test_idx, :], y[test_idx]
# Inner loop: step 4 and 5
fold_base_learners = {name: clone(model)
for name, model in base_learners.items()}
train_base_learners(
fold_base_learners, fold_xtrain, fold_ytrain, verbose=False)
fold_P_base = predict_base_learners(
fold_base_learners, fold_xtest, verbose=False)
cv_preds.append(fold_P_base)
cv_y.append(fold_ytest)
print("Fold %i done" % (i + 1))
print("CV-predictions done")
# Be careful to get rows in the right order
cv_preds = np.vstack(cv_preds)
cv_y = np.hstack(cv_y)
# Train meta learner
print("Fitting meta learner...", end="")
meta_learner.fit(cv_preds, cv_y)
print("done")
return base_learners, meta_learner
%%time
from sklearn.model_selection import KFold
# Train with stacking
cv_base_learners, cv_meta_learner = stacking(
get_models(), clone(meta_learner), xtrain.values, ytrain.values, KFold(2))
P_pred, p = ensemble_predict(cv_base_learners, cv_meta_learner, xtest, verbose=False)
print("\nEnsemble ROC-AUC score: %.3f" % roc_auc_score(ytest, p))
%%time
from mlens.ensemble import SuperLearner
# Instantiate the ensemble with 10 folds
sl = SuperLearner(folds = 10,random_state = SEED,verbose = 2,backend = "multiprocessing")
# Add the base learners and the meta learner
sl.add(list(base_learners.values()),proba=True)
sl.add_meta(meta_learner,proba=True)
# Train the ensemble
sl.fit(xtrain,ytrain)
# Predict the test set
p_sl = sl.predict_proba(xtest)
print("\nSuper Learner ROC-AUC score: %.3f" % roc_auc_score(ytest,p_sl[:, 1]))
plot_roc_curve(ytest,p.reshape(-1, 1),P.mean(axis=1),["Simple average"],"Super Learner")
三、算法总结
Stacking与Blending相比,Blending的优势在于:
(1)Blending比较简单,而Stacking相对比较复杂;
(2)能够防止信息泄露:generalizers和stackers使用不同的数据;
(3)不需要和你的队友分享你的随机种子。
Stacking与Blending相比,Blending的缺点在于:
(1)只用了整体数据的一部分;
(2)最终模型可能对留出集(holdout set)过拟合;
(3)Stacking多次交叉验证要更加稳健。
标签:模型,learner,融合,算法,base,meta,print,import,learners 来源: https://blog.csdn.net/Kunzhong_/article/details/104806246