android SharedPreferences空键,值和集合<?>-极端情况
作者:互联网
正在广泛测试SharedPreferences框架.尽管大多数作品都可以像我期望的那样,但我遇到了一些情况,我想知道它们背后的原因是什么.我通过了一些测试,它们的通用设置是:
Context ctx;
SharedPreferences prefs;
Editor ed;
protected void setUp() throws Exception {
super.setUp();
ctx = getContext();
prefs = PreferenceManager.getDefaultSharedPreferences(ctx);
ed = prefs.edit();
}
protected void tearDown() throws Exception {
if (ed != null) ed.clear().commit();
super.tearDown();
}
现在的怪异点:
>当我输入一个空值时,我必须使用默认的空值来找回它-如果默认值是非空值,我将把这个默认值找回来.即使默认类型与我输入的类型不同.也适用于String和Set< String>. (但是我可以返回一个布尔值):
public void testNullString() {
ed.putString("string_key", null); // putString() and putStringSet() only
ed.commit();
assertTrue(prefs.contains("string_key"));
assertEquals(null, prefs.getString("string_key", null));
// if I specify a non null default I get this default back, not null
assertEquals("a string", prefs.getString("string_key", "a string"));
// *even if I ask for a boolean*
assertEquals(true, prefs.getBoolean("string_key", true));
}
>我可以轻松地将Set< Integer>在偏好中:
@SuppressWarnings("unchecked")
@TargetApi(Build.VERSION_CODES.HONEYCOMB)
public void testNullStringSetsRaw() {
if (Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.HONEYCOMB) {
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes")
final Set integerHashSet = new HashSet();
integerHashSet.add(1);
ed.putStringSet("set_key", integerHashSet);
ed.commit();
final Set<String> defValues = new HashSet<String>();
defValues.add("a string");
Set<String> s = prefs.getStringSet("set_key", defValues);
final String msg = "The set I put in: " + integerHashSet
+ " and what I got out :" + s;
Log.e(TAG, msg); // the same - [1]
assertTrue(msg, integerHashSet.equals(s));
assertTrue(s.contains(1)); // !
}
}
>空键有什么关系?它们似乎是完全合法的密钥:
public void testNullKeyNonNullString() {
final String NULL_KEY = null;
ed.putString(NULL_KEY, "a string");
ed.commit();
assertTrue("Contains null key", prefs.contains(NULL_KEY));
assertEquals("Retrieve the value giving null default", "a string",
prefs.getString(NULL_KEY, null));
assertEquals("Retrieve the value giving default", "a string",
prefs.getString(NULL_KEY, "a string" + "blah"));
try {
// no deal !
prefs.getBoolean(NULL_KEY, true);
fail("Expected CCE");
} catch (ClassCastException e) {}
}
但是我在日志中看到了类似以下内容:org.xmlpull.v1.XmlPullParserException:不带名称属性的映射值:布尔值-参见android getSharedPreferences error: Map value without name attribute: boolean进行讨论.我想知道这是否与空键有关.编辑:它是相关的-复制者:
public class XmlExceptionTest extends AndroidTestCase {
/** Run it twice - on the second run the exception is thrown */
public void testXmlException() {
Context ctx = getContext();
SharedPreferences prefs = PreferenceManager
.getDefaultSharedPreferences(ctx);//exception thrown here(line 18)
// and apparently it clears the prefs as the condition below is false
if (prefs.contains("run_once")) { // false
Log.w("XmlExceptionTest",
"contains null key :" + prefs.contains(null));
}
Editor e = prefs.edit();
e.putBoolean("run_once", true).commit();
e.putString(null, "I put a sting with null key").commit();
assertTrue("Contains null", prefs.contains(null));
PreferenceManager.getDefaultSharedPreferences(ctx); // exception
// NOT thrown here - why ? - apparently there is a static factory
// returning the instance it already constructed
// e.clear().commit(); // this eliminates the exception
}
}
例外情况:
W/ApplicationContext(): getSharedPreferences
W/ApplicationContext(): org.xmlpull.v1.XmlPullParserException: Map value without name attribute: string
W/ApplicationContext(): at com.android.internal.util.XmlUtils.readThisMapXml(XmlUtils.java:521)
W/ApplicationContext(): at com.android.internal.util.XmlUtils.readThisValueXml(XmlUtils.java:733)
W/ApplicationContext(): at com.android.internal.util.XmlUtils.readValueXml(XmlUtils.java:667)
W/ApplicationContext(): at com.android.internal.util.XmlUtils.readMapXml(XmlUtils.java:470)
W/ApplicationContext(): at android.app.ContextImpl.getSharedPreferences(ContextImpl.java:361)
W/ApplicationContext(): at android.preference.PreferenceManager.getDefaultSharedPreferences(PreferenceManager.java:348)
W/ApplicationContext(): at gr.uoa.di.android.helpers.test.XmlExceptionTest.testXmlException(XmlExceptionTest.java:18)
W/ApplicationContext(): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invokeNative(Native Method)
W/ApplicationContext(): at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:521)
W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:154)
W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:127)
W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:106)
W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:124)
W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:109)
W/ApplicationContext(): at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:118)
W/ApplicationContext(): at android.test.AndroidTestRunner.runTest(AndroidTestRunner.java:169)
W/ApplicationContext(): at android.test.AndroidTestRunner.runTest(AndroidTestRunner.java:154)
W/ApplicationContext(): at android.test.InstrumentationTestRunner.onStart(InstrumentationTestRunner.java:520)
W/ApplicationContext(): at android.app.Instrumentation$InstrumentationThread.run(Instrumentation.java:1447)
并且显然在抛出异常时清除了首选项(坏坏坏)
所以我的问题是:确实是我所陈述的行为(或者我错过了一些愚蠢的事情)吗?其背后的动机是什么(尤其是空值行为)?是否已记录在案并保证保持不变-否则可能会更改?第二点是疏忽吗?
解决方法:
> in the code
>是我不了解泛型:
07001
>在这里发布问题:http://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=63463(在Google网上论坛中按常规Noop结果启动discussion之后).实际上,从2014年1月7日开始,该问题被标记为“未来版本” :)
标签:sharedpreferences,android-preferences,android 来源: https://codeday.me/bug/20191122/2060919.html