Moq是否在嘲笑子接口的返回值并忽略中间步骤的错误或功能?
作者:互联网
我最近正在构建一个应用程序,而一位同事写了一个我发誓会失败的设置.我错了.在该方法中,工厂方法设置为期望值为true,并且将返回整数.因为我们没有嘲笑我们的配置,所以布尔总是错误的.
设置是:
var homeStoreDataServiceFactory = new Mock<IHomeStoreDataServiceFactory>();
homeStoreDataServiceFactory.Setup(service => service.Create(true).GetStoreNumber())
.Returns(5);
我认为对factory.Create(false)的调用不会生成模拟对象,因此我们将获得0的整数而不是模拟值5.相反,无论我们将service.Create(X)更改为什么,对GetStoreNumber的调用始终返回5,就像我们使用过It.IsAny()一样.
我建立了MVCE,以便您可以看到我的困惑:
using System;
using Moq;
namespace MoqBugMCV
{
public interface IItemServiceFactory
{
IItemService Create(bool shouldCreateServiceA);
}
public class Item
{
public string Name { get; set; }
public decimal Price { get; set; }
}
public interface IItemService
{
Item GetItem();
}
public class ItemManager
{
private readonly IItemService _itemService;
public ItemManager(IItemServiceFactory itemServiceFactory)
{
_itemService = itemServiceFactory.Create(true); //<==== configured true (like by app.config at runtime or something)
}
public Item GetAnItem()
{
return _itemService.GetItem();
}
}
internal class Program
{
private static void Main(string[] args)
{
var itemServiceFactory = new Mock<IItemServiceFactory>();
var chrisItem = new Item {Name = "Chris's Amazing Item", Price = 1000000};
itemServiceFactory.Setup(factory => factory.Create(true).GetItem())
.Returns(chrisItem);
var itemManager = new ItemManager(itemServiceFactory.Object);
var theItem = itemManager.GetAnItem();
Console.WriteLine("The item is {0} and costs {1}", theItem.Name, theItem.Price);
var itemServiceFactoryBroken = new Mock<IItemServiceFactory>();
itemServiceFactoryBroken.Setup(factory => factory.Create(false).GetItem()).Returns(chrisItem); //expecting this to fail, because IItemServiceFactory.Create(true) is configured
itemManager = new ItemManager(itemServiceFactoryBroken.Object);
theItem = itemManager.GetAnItem();
Console.WriteLine("The item is {0} and costs {1}", theItem.Name, theItem.Price); //would expect the item would be null or values to be blank
}
}
}
所以…这是错误还是功能,还是我不了解Moq?
解决方法:
是的,似乎将应用于递归Moq的中间解除引用的任何过滤器都忽略为per here-即使使用It.匹配器,则过滤器将被忽略.即,目前,递归模拟将始终生成与It.IsAny相关的内容.如前所述,在中间取消引用的任何参数上.
现在,我将分手:
.Setup(service => service.Create(true).GetStoreNumber()
并将其分为:
mockFactory.Setup(f => f.Create(xx))
mockService.Setup(service => service.GetStoreNumber())
将此分离应用于您的MVCE示例,以下设置仅模拟factory.Create(false),而将factory.Create(true)保留为引用类型的默认返回值null:
var itemServiceFactory = new Mock<IItemServiceFactory>();
var itemService = new Mock<IItemService>();
itemService.Setup(svc => svc.GetItem()).Returns(chrisItem);
itemServiceFactory.Setup(factory => factory.Create(false))
.Returns(itemService.Object);
var itemManager = new ItemManager(itemServiceFactory.Object);
var theItem = itemManager.GetAnItem(); // Get NRE on _itemService.GetItem as expected
因此,嘲笑factory.Create(true)将使用设置服务,而GetAnItem()将返回令人惊奇的项目.
编辑
似乎有一种方法可以在中间步骤上实现过滤,并使用Linq to Mocks一次性压缩工厂和服务模拟的设置:
var itemServiceFactory = Mock.Of<IItemServiceFactory>(
fac => fac.Create(false) == Mock.Of<IItemService>(
svc => svc.GetItem() == chrisItem));
var itemManager = new ItemManager(itemServiceFactory);
var theItem = itemManager.GetAnItem();
标签:unit-testing,moq,configuration,c,visual-studio 来源: https://codeday.me/bug/20191120/2047480.html