SGMII、1000BASE-X、1000BASE-T区别
作者:互联网
最近研究光纤传输,发现对于SGMII、1000BASE-X的概念很容易模糊,网上各种查资料也不是很清楚,在此把搜集到的一些信息贴出来,以供参考。
来自Xilinx 论坛:https://forums.xilinx.com/t5/General-Technical-Discussion/Ethernet-1000base-X-VS-SGMII/td-p/483338
Registered: 07-31-2010 Re: Ethernet 1000base-X VS SGMII1000BASE-X is intended to go to a SFP. It was intended for point to point electical links on PCB, as well as an interface to 1000BASE-LX and 1000BASE-SX.
SGMII is a serialization of the GMII signals, and was intended to connect a MAC to a PHY.
They ended up having similar features, and many devices ended up supporting both. For example, the Xilinx core supports both. Many ethernet PHYs support both.
For 1000BASE-T SFP+ modules, it looks like there is a similar feature with some modules supporting one or both standards.
Both protocols should work between optical SFP+ modules that are controlled by the FPGA. However, you should make sure that any high/low BW pins on the SFP+ are set correctly, and that the SFP+'s don't require a specific protocol.
Otherwise you should favor the protocol that will work with other devices. This is probably 1000BASE-X.
If you are having issues with 1000BASE-X, make sure all reset/clocking is done. Note that some config values are loaded on edges of the res
来自88E1512 datasheet:
综合上述信息得出:SGMII本身设计是用于MAC和PHY之间连接的协议。和1000BASE-X有很多共同特性,包括编码方式等,但是自协商这部分应该不一样。
都可以用在在光纤中传输,但是要想保证兼容性,和别的设备能够对接的话,使用光纤最好还是用1000BASE-X的模式。
作者:huakaimanlin
出处:https://www.cnblogs.com/huakaimanlin/
标签:both,intended,区别,SGMII,SFP,should,1000BASE 来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/Ph-one/p/16148064.html