4.死信队列
作者:互联网
目录
死信队列
当消息未被确认消费,在满足指定规则情况下,会进入死信队列,运维人员会对一直不能消费的消息进行处理
生产者
/**
* 同步-生产消息
* @param msg
* @throws PulsarClientException
*/
@GetMapping("/deal/sendMsgBySync")
public MessageId sendMsgBySync(String msg) throws PulsarClientException {
PulsarClient pulsarFactory = pulsarConf.pulsarFactory();
Producer<byte[]> producer = pulsarFactory.newProducer()
.topic("my-deal-topic")
.create();
// 然后你就可以发送消息到指定的broker 和topic上:
return producer.send(msg.getBytes());
}
消费者
@Bean
public void comsumerByDealListener() throws Exception {
MessageListener myMessageListener = (consumer, msg) -> {
String anObject = new String(msg.getData());
System.out.println("收到消息了");
// int i=1/0;//故意报错
try {
System.out.println("Message received: " + anObject);
// consumer.acknowledge(msg);//故意不确认消费
} catch (Exception e) {
// consumer.negativeAcknowledge(msg);//故意不确认消费
}
};
PulsarClient pulsarFactory = pulsarConf.pulsarFactory();
pulsarFactory.newConsumer()
.topic("my-deal-topic")
.subscriptionName("my-subscriptionByListener")
.ackTimeout(3, TimeUnit.SECONDS)//指定超时多久未确认消息后判断为异常
.subscriptionType(SubscriptionType.Shared)
.messageListener(myMessageListener)
.deadLetterPolicy(DeadLetterPolicy.builder()
.maxRedeliverCount(4)//指定消费失败重试次数,超过次数进入死信队列
.deadLetterTopic("dealtopic")//死信队列名,不指定的话默认:{TopicName}-{Subscription}-DLQ
.build())
.subscribe();
}
死信队列
死信队列可使用监听方案
@GetMapping("/deal/cunsumerDeadLetterTopic")
public void cunsumerDeadLetterTopic() throws PulsarClientException {
PulsarClient pulsarFactory = pulsarConf.pulsarFactory();
Consumer<byte[]> consumer = pulsarFactory.newConsumer()
.topic("dealtopic")
.subscriptionName("mysubscriptiondlq")
.subscribe();
Message<byte[]> receive = consumer.receive();
System.out.println(new String(receive.getData()));
consumer.acknowledge(receive);//确认消息被消费
consumer.close();
}
验证流程
1.打开死信队列监听/deal/cunsumerDeadLetterTopic(这步无所谓)
2.调用生产消息接口deal/sendMsgBySync
3.消费者comsumerByDealListener中有“故意报错”和注释掉的“acknowledge”,导致必然无法消费
-
消费者会重试四次,然后进入死信队列
注:消费者会进入五次,首次+四次重试
代码下载
标签:deal,队列,pulsarFactory,死信,msg,consumer 来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/rb2010/p/15314691.html