SpringCloud之Ribbon源码解析(二)--请求流程
作者:互联网
一 RestTemplate.doExecute
protected <T> T doExecute(URI url, HttpMethod method, RequestCallback requestCallback, ResponseExtractor<T> responseExtractor) throws RestClientException { Assert.notNull(url, "'url' must not be null"); Assert.notNull(method, "'method' must not be null"); ClientHttpResponse response = null; try { ClientHttpRequest request = createRequest(url, method); if (requestCallback != null) { requestCallback.doWithRequest(request); } response = request.execute(); handleResponse(url, method, response); if (responseExtractor != null) { return responseExtractor.extractData(response); } else { return null; } }
当使用带有负载均衡的功能时createRequest内有乾坤了
public abstract class HttpAccessor { private ClientHttpRequestFactory requestFactory = new SimpleClientHttpRequestFactory(); public void setRequestFactory(ClientHttpRequestFactory requestFactory) { Assert.notNull(requestFactory, "ClientHttpRequestFactory must not be null"); this.requestFactory = requestFactory; } public ClientHttpRequestFactory getRequestFactory() { return this.requestFactory; } protected ClientHttpRequest createRequest(URI url, HttpMethod method) throws IOException { ClientHttpRequest request = getRequestFactory().createRequest(url, method); if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) { logger.debug("Created " + method.name() + " request for \"" + url + "\""); } return request; } }
getRequestFactory并不是当前HttpAccessor类中定义的,而是在子类InterceptingHttpAccessor中定义的。
public abstract class InterceptingHttpAccessor extends HttpAccessor { private List<ClientHttpRequestInterceptor> interceptors = new ArrayList<ClientHttpRequestInterceptor>(); public void setInterceptors(List<ClientHttpRequestInterceptor> interceptors) { this.interceptors = interceptors; } public List<ClientHttpRequestInterceptor> getInterceptors() { return interceptors; } @Override public ClientHttpRequestFactory getRequestFactory() { ClientHttpRequestFactory delegate = super.getRequestFactory(); if (!CollectionUtils.isEmpty(getInterceptors())) { return new InterceptingClientHttpRequestFactory(delegate, getInterceptors()); } else { return delegate; } }
上一节我们分析了,通过RestTemplateCustomizer 注入拦截器到RestTemplate里,所以这里判断是存在拦截器的。
在有拦截器注入的情况下,创建InterceptingClientHttpRequestFactory工厂,该工厂就是创建带拦截器的请求实例,因为注入了负载均衡拦截器,所以这里就从InterceptingClientHttpRequestFactory工厂创建。
二 InterceptingClientHttpRequestFactory
public class InterceptingClientHttpRequestFactory extends AbstractClientHttpRequestFactoryWrapper { private final List<ClientHttpRequestInterceptor> interceptors; public InterceptingClientHttpRequestFactory(ClientHttpRequestFactory requestFactory, List<ClientHttpRequestInterceptor> interceptors) { super(requestFactory); this.interceptors = (interceptors != null ? interceptors : Collections.<ClientHttpRequestInterceptor>emptyList()); } @Override protected ClientHttpRequest createRequest(URI uri, HttpMethod httpMethod, ClientHttpRequestFactory requestFactory) { return new InterceptingClientHttpRequest(requestFactory, this.interceptors, uri, httpMethod); } }
此时的请求已经是 InterceptingClientHttpRequest了,接下来我们看InterceptingClientHttpRequest的execute方法
public abstract class AbstractClientHttpRequest implements ClientHttpRequest { private final HttpHeaders headers = new HttpHeaders(); private boolean executed = false; @Override public final HttpHeaders getHeaders() { return (this.executed ? HttpHeaders.readOnlyHttpHeaders(this.headers) : this.headers); } @Override public final OutputStream getBody() throws IOException { assertNotExecuted(); return getBodyInternal(this.headers); } @Override public final ClientHttpResponse execute() throws IOException { assertNotExecuted(); ClientHttpResponse result = executeInternal(this.headers); this.executed = true; return result; }
class InterceptingClientHttpRequest extends AbstractBufferingClientHttpRequest { // 略 @Override protected final ClientHttpResponse executeInternal(HttpHeaders headers, byte[] bufferedOutput) throws IOException { InterceptingRequestExecution requestExecution = new InterceptingRequestExecution(); return requestExecution.execute(this, bufferedOutput); } private class InterceptingRequestExecution implements ClientHttpRequestExecution { private final Iterator<ClientHttpRequestInterceptor> iterator; public InterceptingRequestExecution() { this.iterator = interceptors.iterator(); } @Override public ClientHttpResponse execute(HttpRequest request, byte[] body) throws IOException { if (this.iterator.hasNext()) { ClientHttpRequestInterceptor nextInterceptor = this.iterator.next(); return nextInterceptor.intercept(request, body, this); }
终于调用到了上一节开始提到的LoadBalancerInterceptor
三 LoadBalancerInterceptor
public class LoadBalancerInterceptor implements ClientHttpRequestInterceptor { private LoadBalancerClient loadBalancer; private LoadBalancerRequestFactory requestFactory; public LoadBalancerInterceptor(LoadBalancerClient loadBalancer, LoadBalancerRequestFactory requestFactory) { this.loadBalancer = loadBalancer; this.requestFactory = requestFactory; } public LoadBalancerInterceptor(LoadBalancerClient loadBalancer) { // for backwards compatibility this(loadBalancer, new LoadBalancerRequestFactory(loadBalancer)); } @Override public ClientHttpResponse intercept(final HttpRequest request, final byte[] body, final ClientHttpRequestExecution execution) throws IOException { final URI originalUri = request.getURI(); String serviceName = originalUri.getHost(); Assert.state(serviceName != null, "Request URI does not contain a valid hostname: " + originalUri); return this.loadBalancer.execute(serviceName, requestFactory.createRequest(request, body, execution)); } }
在RibbonLoadBalancerClient的第一个execute方法以及getServer方法中可以看到,实际上是通过ILoadBalancer的负载均衡器实现类作的chooseServer方法选取一个服务,交给接下来的请求对象发起一个请求。
这里的负载均衡实现类默认是ZoneAwareLoadBalancer区域感知负载均衡器实例,其内部通过均衡策略选择一个服务。
public class RibbonLoadBalancerClient implements LoadBalancerClient { @Override public <T> T execute(String serviceId, LoadBalancerRequest<T> request) throws IOException { ILoadBalancer loadBalancer = getLoadBalancer(serviceId); Server server = getServer(loadBalancer); if (server == null) { throw new IllegalStateException("No instances available for " + serviceId); } RibbonServer ribbonServer = new RibbonServer(serviceId, server, isSecure(server, serviceId), serverIntrospector(serviceId).getMetadata(server)); return execute(serviceId, ribbonServer, request); } @Override public <T> T execute(String serviceId, ServiceInstance serviceInstance, LoadBalancerRequest<T> request) throws IOException { Server server = null; if(serviceInstance instanceof RibbonServer) { server = ((RibbonServer)serviceInstance).getServer(); } if (server == null) { throw new IllegalStateException("No instances available for " + serviceId); } RibbonLoadBalancerContext context = this.clientFactory .getLoadBalancerContext(serviceId); RibbonStatsRecorder statsRecorder = new RibbonStatsRecorder(context, server); try { T returnVal = request.apply(serviceInstance); statsRecorder.recordStats(returnVal); return returnVal; } // catch IOException and rethrow so RestTemplate behaves correctly catch (IOException ex) { statsRecorder.recordStats(ex); throw ex; } catch (Exception ex) { statsRecorder.recordStats(ex); ReflectionUtils.rethrowRuntimeException(ex); } return null; } // 略 protected Server getServer(ILoadBalancer loadBalancer) { if (loadBalancer == null) { return null; } return loadBalancer.chooseServer("default"); // TODO: better handling of key }
总结下就是最终是通过ZoneAwareLoadBalancer从服务区注册中心选择服务来实现的负载均衡
标签:return,--,SpringCloud,request,requestFactory,源码,null,public,loadBalancer 来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/juniorMa/p/14416520.html