AspNetCore3.1_Secutiry源码解析_8_Authorization_授权框架
作者：互联网
目录
- AspNetCore3.1_Secutiry源码解析_1_目录
- AspNetCore3.1_Secutiry源码解析_2_Authentication_核心流程
- AspNetCore3.1_Secutiry源码解析_3_Authentication_Cookies
- AspNetCore3.1_Secutiry源码解析_4_Authentication_JwtBear
- AspNetCore3.1_Secutiry源码解析_5_Authentication_OAuth
- AspNetCore3.1_Secutiry源码解析_6_Authentication_OpenIdConnect
- AspNetCore3.1_Secutiry源码解析_7_Authentication_其他
- AspNetCore3.1_Secutiry源码解析_8_Authorization_授权框架
简介
开篇提到过，认证主要解决的是who are you，授权解决的是 are you allowed的问题。各种认证架构可以帮我们知道用户身份（claims），oauth等架构的scope字段能够控制api服务级别的访问权限，但是更加细化和多变的功能授权不是它们的处理范围。
微软的Authorization项目提供了基于策略的灵活的授权框架。
推荐看下面博客了解，我主要学习和梳理源码。
https://www.cnblogs.com/RainingNight/p/authorization-in-asp-net-core.html
依赖注入
注入了以下接口，提供了默认实现
- IAuthorizationService ：授权服务，主干服务
- IAuthorizationPolicyProvider ： 策略提供类
- IAuthorizationHandlerProvider：处理器提供类
- IAuthorizationEvaluator：校验类
- IAuthorizationHandlerContextFactory：授权上下文工厂
- IAuthorizationHandler：授权处理器，这个是注入的集合，一个策略可以有多个授权处理器，依次执行
- 配置类：AuthorizationOptions
微软的命名风格还是比较一致的
Service：服务
Provider：某类的提供者
Evaluator：校验预处理类
Factory：工厂
Handler：处理器
Context：上下文
看源码的过程，不仅可以学习框架背后原理，还可以学习编码风格和设计模式，还是挺有用处的。
/// <summary>
/// Adds authorization services to the specified <see cref="IServiceCollection" />.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="services">The <see cref="IServiceCollection" /> to add services to.</param>
/// <returns>The <see cref="IServiceCollection"/> so that additional calls can be chained.</returns>
public static IServiceCollection AddAuthorizationCore(this IServiceCollection services)
{
if (services == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services));
}
services.TryAdd(ServiceDescriptor.Transient<IAuthorizationService, DefaultAuthorizationService>());
services.TryAdd(ServiceDescriptor.Transient<IAuthorizationPolicyProvider, DefaultAuthorizationPolicyProvider>());
services.TryAdd(ServiceDescriptor.Transient<IAuthorizationHandlerProvider, DefaultAuthorizationHandlerProvider>());
services.TryAdd(ServiceDescriptor.Transient<IAuthorizationEvaluator, DefaultAuthorizationEvaluator>());
services.TryAdd(ServiceDescriptor.Transient<IAuthorizationHandlerContextFactory, DefaultAuthorizationHandlerContextFactory>());
services.TryAddEnumerable(ServiceDescriptor.Transient<IAuthorizationHandler, PassThroughAuthorizationHandler>());
return services;
}
/// <summary>
/// Adds authorization services to the specified <see cref="IServiceCollection" />.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="services">The <see cref="IServiceCollection" /> to add services to.</param>
/// <param name="configure">An action delegate to configure the provided <see cref="AuthorizationOptions"/>.</param>
/// <returns>The <see cref="IServiceCollection"/> so that additional calls can be chained.</returns>
public static IServiceCollection AddAuthorizationCore(this IServiceCollection services, Action<AuthorizationOptions> configure)
{
if (services == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(services));
}
if (configure != null)
{
services.Configure(configure);
}
return services.AddAuthorizationCore();
}
配置类 - AuthorizationOptions
- PolicyMap：策略名称&策略的字典数据
- InvokeHandlersAfterFailure： 授权处理器失败后是否触发下一个处理器，默认true
- DefaultPolicy：默认策略，构造了一个RequireAuthenticatedUser策略，即需要认证用户，不允许匿名访问。现在有点线索了，为什么api一加上[Authorize]，就会校验授权。
- FallbackPolicy：保底策略。没有任何策略的时候会使用保底策略。感觉有点多此一举，不是给了个默认策略吗？
- AddPolicy：添加策略
- GetPolicy：获取策略
/// <summary>
/// Provides programmatic configuration used by <see cref="IAuthorizationService"/> and <see cref="IAuthorizationPolicyProvider"/>.
/// </summary>
public class AuthorizationOptions
{
private IDictionary<string, AuthorizationPolicy> PolicyMap { get; } = new Dictionary<string, AuthorizationPolicy>(StringComparer.OrdinalIgnoreCase);
/// <summary>
/// Determines whether authentication handlers should be invoked after a failure.
/// Defaults to true.
/// </summary>
public bool InvokeHandlersAfterFailure { get; set; } = true;
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets the default authorization policy. Defaults to require authenticated users.
/// </summary>
/// <remarks>
/// The default policy used when evaluating <see cref="IAuthorizeData"/> with no policy name specified.
/// </remarks>
public AuthorizationPolicy DefaultPolicy { get; set; } = new AuthorizationPolicyBuilder().RequireAuthenticatedUser().Build();
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets the fallback authorization policy used by <see cref="AuthorizationPolicy.CombineAsync(IAuthorizationPolicyProvider, IEnumerable{IAuthorizeData})"/>
/// when no IAuthorizeData have been provided. As a result, the AuthorizationMiddleware uses the fallback policy
/// if there are no <see cref="IAuthorizeData"/> instances for a resource. If a resource has any <see cref="IAuthorizeData"/>
/// then they are evaluated instead of the fallback policy. By default the fallback policy is null, and usually will have no
/// effect unless you have the AuthorizationMiddleware in your pipeline. It is not used in any way by the
/// default <see cref="IAuthorizationService"/>.
/// </summary>
public AuthorizationPolicy FallbackPolicy { get; set; }
/// <summary>
/// Add an authorization policy with the provided name.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="name">The name of the policy.</param>
/// <param name="policy">The authorization policy.</param>
public void AddPolicy(string name, AuthorizationPolicy policy)
{
if (name == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(name));
}
if (policy == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(policy));
}
PolicyMap[name] = policy;
}
/// <summary>
/// Add a policy that is built from a delegate with the provided name.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="name">The name of the policy.</param>
/// <param name="configurePolicy">The delegate that will be used to build the policy.</param>
public void AddPolicy(string name, Action<AuthorizationPolicyBuilder> configurePolicy)
{
if (name == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(name));
}
if (configurePolicy == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(configurePolicy));
}
var policyBuilder = new AuthorizationPolicyBuilder();
configurePolicy(policyBuilder);
PolicyMap[name] = policyBuilder.Build();
}
/// <summary>
/// Returns the policy for the specified name, or null if a policy with the name does not exist.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="name">The name of the policy to return.</param>
/// <returns>The policy for the specified name, or null if a policy with the name does not exist.</returns>
public AuthorizationPolicy GetPolicy(string name)
{
if (name == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(name));
}
return PolicyMap.ContainsKey(name) ? PolicyMap[name] : null;
}
}
IAuthorizationService - 授权服务 - 主干逻辑
接口定义了授权方法，有两个重载，一个是基于requirements校验，一个是基于policyName校验。
Task<AuthorizationResult> AuthorizeAsync(ClaimsPrincipal user, object resource, IEnumerable<IAuthorizationRequirement> requirements);
Task<AuthorizationResult> AuthorizeAsync(ClaimsPrincipal user, object resource, string policyName);
看下默认实现DefaultAuthorizationService的处理,逻辑还是比较简单
- 获取策略
- 获取策略的授权条件
- 获取授权上下文
- 获取处理器集合
- 处理器依次执行，结果存入上下文
- 校验器验证上下文
- 返回授权结果类
/// <summary>
/// The default implementation of an <see cref="IAuthorizationService"/>.
/// </summary>
public class DefaultAuthorizationService : IAuthorizationService
{
private readonly AuthorizationOptions _options;
private readonly IAuthorizationHandlerContextFactory _contextFactory;
private readonly IAuthorizationHandlerProvider _handlers;
private readonly IAuthorizationEvaluator _evaluator;
private readonly IAuthorizationPolicyProvider _policyProvider;
private readonly ILogger _logger;
/// <summary>
/// Creates a new instance of <see cref="DefaultAuthorizationService"/>.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="policyProvider">The <see cref="IAuthorizationPolicyProvider"/> used to provide policies.</param>
/// <param name="handlers">The handlers used to fulfill <see cref="IAuthorizationRequirement"/>s.</param>
/// <param name="logger">The logger used to log messages, warnings and errors.</param>
/// <param name="contextFactory">The <see cref="IAuthorizationHandlerContextFactory"/> used to create the context to handle the authorization.</param>
/// <param name="evaluator">The <see cref="IAuthorizationEvaluator"/> used to determine if authorization was successful.</param>
/// <param name="options">The <see cref="AuthorizationOptions"/> used.</param>
public DefaultAuthorizationService(IAuthorizationPolicyProvider policyProvider, IAuthorizationHandlerProvider handlers, ILogger<DefaultAuthorizationService> logger, IAuthorizationHandlerContextFactory contextFactory, IAuthorizationEvaluator evaluator, IOptions<AuthorizationOptions> options)
{
if (options == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(options));
}
if (policyProvider == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(policyProvider));
}
if (handlers == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(handlers));
}
if (logger == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(logger));
}
if (contextFactory == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(contextFactory));
}
if (evaluator == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(evaluator));
}
_options = options.Value;
_handlers = handlers;
_policyProvider = policyProvider;
_logger = logger;
_evaluator = evaluator;
_contextFactory = contextFactory;
}
/// <summary>
/// Checks if a user meets a specific set of requirements for the specified resource.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="user">The user to evaluate the requirements against.</param>
/// <param name="resource">The resource to evaluate the requirements against.</param>
/// <param name="requirements">The requirements to evaluate.</param>
/// <returns>
/// A flag indicating whether authorization has succeeded.
/// This value is <value>true</value> when the user fulfills the policy otherwise <value>false</value>.
/// </returns>
public async Task<AuthorizationResult> AuthorizeAsync(ClaimsPrincipal user, object resource, IEnumerable<IAuthorizationRequirement> requirements)
{
if (requirements == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(requirements));
}
var authContext = _contextFactory.CreateContext(requirements, user, resource);
var handlers = await _handlers.GetHandlersAsync(authContext);
foreach (var handler in handlers)
{
await handler.HandleAsync(authContext);
if (!_options.InvokeHandlersAfterFailure && authContext.HasFailed)
{
break;
}
}
var result = _evaluator.Evaluate(authContext);
if (result.Succeeded)
{
_logger.UserAuthorizationSucceeded();
}
else
{
_logger.UserAuthorizationFailed();
}
return result;
}
/// <summary>
/// Checks if a user meets a specific authorization policy.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="user">The user to check the policy against.</param>
/// <param name="resource">The resource the policy should be checked with.</param>
/// <param name="policyName">The name of the policy to check against a specific context.</param>
/// <returns>
/// A flag indicating whether authorization has succeeded.
/// This value is <value>true</value> when the user fulfills the policy otherwise <value>false</value>.
/// </returns>
public async Task<AuthorizationResult> AuthorizeAsync(ClaimsPrincipal user, object resource, string policyName)
{
if (policyName == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(policyName));
}
var policy = await _policyProvider.GetPolicyAsync(policyName);
if (policy == null)
{
throw new InvalidOperationException($"No policy found: {policyName}.");
}
return await this.AuthorizeAsync(user, resource, policy);
}
}
默认策略 - 需要认证用户
默认策略添加了校验条件DenyAnonymousAuthorizationRequirement
public AuthorizationPolicyBuilder RequireAuthenticatedUser()
{
Requirements.Add(new DenyAnonymousAuthorizationRequirement());
return this;
}
校验上下文中是否存在认证用户信息，验证通过则在上下文中将校验条件标记为成功。
protected override Task HandleRequirementAsync(AuthorizationHandlerContext context, DenyAnonymousAuthorizationRequirement requirement)
{
var user = context.User;
var userIsAnonymous =
user?.Identity == null ||
!user.Identities.Any(i => i.IsAuthenticated);
if (!userIsAnonymous)
{
context.Succeed(requirement);
}
return Task.CompletedTask;
}
授权时序图
授权项目还是比较好理解的，微软提供了一个基于策略的授权模型，大部门的具体的业务代码还是需要自己去实现的。
classDiagram class AuthorizationPolicy{ Requirements } class Requirement{ } class AuthorizationHandler{ } class IAuthorizationHandler{ +HandleAsync(AuthorizationHandlerContext context) } class IAuthorizationRequirement{ } Requirement-->AuthorizationHandler AuthorizationHandler-->IAuthorizationHandler Requirement-->IAuthorizationHandler Requirement-->IAuthorizationRequirement中间件去哪了？
开发不需要编写UseAuthorization类似代码，项目中也没发现中间件，甚至找不到 使用AuthorizeAttribute的地方。那么问题来了，框架怎么知道某个方法标记了[Authorize]特性，然后执行校验的呢？
答案是Mvc框架处理的，它读取了节点的[Authorize]和[AllowAnonymous]特性，并触发相应的逻辑。关于Mvc的就不细说了，感兴趣可以翻看源码。
AspNetCore\src\Mvc\Mvc.Core\src\ApplicationModels\AuthorizationApplicationModelProvider.cs。
public void OnProvidersExecuting(ApplicationModelProviderContext context)
{
if (context == null)
{
throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(context));
}
if (_mvcOptions.EnableEndpointRouting)
{
// When using endpoint routing, the AuthorizationMiddleware does the work that Auth filters would otherwise perform.
// Consequently we do not need to convert authorization attributes to filters.
return;
}
foreach (var controllerModel in context.Result.Controllers)
{
var controllerModelAuthData = controllerModel.Attributes.OfType<IAuthorizeData>().ToArray();
if (controllerModelAuthData.Length > 0)
{
controllerModel.Filters.Add(GetFilter(_policyProvider, controllerModelAuthData));
}
foreach (var attribute in controllerModel.Attributes.OfType<IAllowAnonymous>())
{
controllerModel.Filters.Add(new AllowAnonymousFilter());
}
foreach (var actionModel in controllerModel.Actions)
{
var actionModelAuthData = actionModel.Attributes.OfType<IAuthorizeData>().ToArray();
if (actionModelAuthData.Length > 0)
{
actionModel.Filters.Add(GetFilter(_policyProvider, actionModelAuthData));
}
foreach (var attribute in actionModel.Attributes.OfType<IAllowAnonymous>())
{
actionModel.Filters.Add(new AllowAnonymousFilter());
}
}
}
}
标签：name,Secutiry,services,源码,new,policy,AspNetCore3.1,null,throw 来源： https://www.cnblogs.com/holdengong/p/12575914.html