ipfs, libp2p stream peformance test

Test ENV

Two libp2p hosts running on the same PC, communicating to each other with loopback interface

Host A -> Host B, uni-direction

Case 1, secio, AES+SHA

19:19:34.257 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=51.39MB/s, elapsed=19.458s common.go:1001
19:19:55.198 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=57.77MB/s, elapsed=17.309s common.go:1001
19:20:14.228 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=57.98MB/s, elapsed=17.247s common.go:1001

Case 2, tls, AES-GCM-128 by default

19:16:16.947 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=80.40MB/s, elapsed=12.438s common.go:1002
19:16:32.845 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=79.87MB/s, elapsed=12.521s common.go:1002
19:16:50.199 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=78.85MB/s, elapsed=12.682s common.go:1002

Case 3, no security

19:21:53.118 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=101.13MB/s, elapsed=9.888s common.go:1002
19:22:06.980 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=106.45MB/s, elapsed=9.394s common.go:1002
19:22:18.085 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=98.71MB/s, elapsed=10.131s common.go:1002

Case 4, Private Network(salsa20) + no security

21:22:14.351 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=79.69MB/s, elapsed=12.549s common.go:1031
21:22:32.460 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=80.20MB/s, elapsed=12.469s common.go:1031
21:22:46.370 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=79.90MB/s, elapsed=12.516s common.go:1031

Case 5, Private Network(salsa20) + secio

21:25:20.243 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=50.35MB/s, elapsed=19.86s common.go:1031
21:25:43.967 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=50.66MB/s, elapsed=19.738s common.go:1031
21:26:05.711 ERROR     common: Copied=1000M, rate=52.85MB/s, elapsed=18.923s common.go:1031

Conclusion

• secio is quite slow, need GCM support in future
• salsa20 is good, but probably less secure than AES

• 点赞
• 收藏
• 分享
• • 文章举报

Kingwel2020 发布了11 篇原创文章 · 获赞 4 · 访问量 504 私信 关注

标签：peformance,ipfs,MB,elapsed,go,rate,common,ERROR,test
来源： https://blog.csdn.net/m0_37889044/article/details/104429130