await keyword blocks main thread
作者:互联网
await keyword blocks main thread
问题
So I have the following code
private async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
await DoSomethingAsync();
MessageBox.Show("Test");
}
private async Task DoSomethingAsync()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++)
{
int a = 5;
}; // simulate job
MessageBox.Show("DoSomethingAsync is done");
await DoSomething2Async();
}
private async Task DoSomething2Async()
{
for (int i = 0; i < 1000000000; i++)
{
int a = 5;
} // simulate job
MessageBox.Show("DoSomething2Async is done");
}
Until both MessageBoxes are shown the main thread is block (I mean the application itself is frozen). There is obviously something wrong with my code and I can't figure out what. I've never used async/await before. this is my first attempt.
EDIT:
Actually what i want to do is to start Execution of DoSomethingAsync
asynchronously so that when button is clicked the MessageBox.Show("Test");
would execute even though the DoSomethingAsync is incomplete.
@Tobberoth, no, it's not what
await
does. It returns to the caller, and resumes the method when the awaited task it complete.
– Thomas Levesque
Nov 6, 2013 at 13:57
回答1
I think you misunderstand what async means. It doesn't mean that the method runs in another thread!!
An async method runs synchronously until the first await
, then returns a Task
to the caller (unless it's async void
, then it returns nothing). When the task that is being awaited completes, execution resumes after the await
, usually on the same thread (if it has a SynchronizationContext
).
In your case, the Thread.Sleep
is before the first await, so it's executed synchronously, before control is returned to the caller. But even if it was after the await
, it would still block the UI thread, unless you specifically configured the the awaiter not to capture the synchronization context (using ConfigureAwait(false)
).
Thread.Sleep
is a blocking method. If you want an async equivalent, use await Task.Delay(3000)
, as suggested in Sriram Sakthivel's answer. It will return immediately, and resume after 3 seconds, without blocking the UI thread.
It's a common misconception that async is related to multithreading. It can be, but in many cases it's not. A new thread is not implicitly spawned just because the method is async
; for a new thread to spawn, it has to be done explicitly at some point. If you specifically want the method to run on a different thread, use Task.Run
.
回答2
You should note that methods marked with async
will no longer behave async when it lacks await
. You'd have got compiler warning about this.
Warning 1 This async method lacks 'await' operators and will run synchronously. Consider using the 'await' operator to await non-blocking API calls, or 'await Task.Run(...)' to do CPU-bound work on a background thread.
You should give attention to those warnings.
Do it asynchronously. When I say asynchronous it is really asynchronous not synchronous job in another thread. Use Task.Delay
which is really asynchronous. Use Task.Run
for some time consuming job which is CPU bound.
private async void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
await DoSomethingAsync();
}
private async Task DoSomethingAsync()
{
await Task.Delay(3000); // simulate job
MessageBox.Show("DoSomethingAsync is done");
await DoSomething2Async();
}
private async Task DoSomething2Async()
{
await Task.Delay(3000); // simulate job
MessageBox.Show("DoSomething2Async is done");
}
回答3
You're not doing anything asynchronously. Try:
await Task.Run(() => Thread.Sleep(3000))
When you await a method, what you are effectively doing is providing a callback, with the code that follows it as what is executed once it finishes (in previous incarnations of async you actually had to set this up yourself). If you don't await
anything then the method isn't really an asynchronous one.
For further information, you could do worse than looking here:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/jon_skeet/archive/2011/05/08/eduasync-part-1-introduction.aspx
Following your edit; try this:
public void MyMessageBox()
{
var thread = new Thread(() =>
{
MessageBox.Show(...);
});
thread.Start();
}
Although, are you sure it's really a message box you want? I would have thought a status bar / progress bar update would fit better.
标签:Task,blocks,thread,await,DoSomethingAsync,async,main,method 来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/chucklu/p/16446918.html