21. Changes from RFC 5245【对 RFC 5245 的更改】
作者:互联网
原文链接:https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8445#section-21
21. Changes from RFC 5245【对 RFC 5245 的更改】
The purpose of this updated ICE specification is to:
此更新的 ICE 规范的目的是:
- Clarify procedures in RFC 5245.
阐明 RFC 5245 中的程序。 - Make technical changes, due to discovered flaws in RFC 5245 and feedback from the community that has implemented and deployed ICE applications based on RFC 5245.
由于 RFC 5245 中发现的缺陷以及基于 RFC 5245 实施和部署 ICE 应用程序的社区的反馈,进行技术更改。 - Make the procedures independent of the signaling protocol, by removing the SIP and SDP procedures. Procedures specific to a signaling protocol will be defined in separate usage documents.[ICE-SIP-SDP] defines ICE usage with SIP and SDP.
通过删除 SIP 和 SDP 程序,使程序独立于信令协议。 特定于信令协议的程序将在单独的使用文档中定义。[ICE-SIP-SDP] 定义了 ICE 与 SIP 和 SDP 的使用。
The following technical changes have been done:
进行了以下技术更改:
- Aggressive nomination removed.
删除了积极指派候选 - The procedures for calculating candidate pair states and scheduling connectivity checks modified.
计算候选对状态和调度连通性检查的程序已修改。 - Procedures for calculation of Ta and RTO modified.
修改了计算 Ta 和 RTO 的程序。 - Active checklist and Frozen checklist definitions removed.
删除了活动清单和冻结清单定义。 - ‘ice2’ ICE option added.
添加了“ice2”ICE 选项。 - IPv6 considerations modified.
修改了 IPv6 的注意事项。 - Usage with no-op for keepalives, and keepalives with non-ICE peers, removed.
删除了对 keepalive 的无操作使用,以及与非 ICE 对等方的 keepalive。
22. References 【参考目录】
标签:SIP,SDP,5245,procedures,ICE,RFC,Changes 来源: https://blog.csdn.net/CC19981127/article/details/122655328