linux – 共享库中的重定位条目
作者：互联网
我正在调查共享库的重定位,并遇到了一些奇怪的问题.考虑以下代码：
int myglob;
int ml_util_func(int p)
{
return p + 2;
}
int ml_func2(int a, int b)
{
int c = ml_util_func(a);
return c + b + myglob;
}
我用gcc -shared将它编译为非PIC共享库.我在运行x86的32位Ubuntu上执行此操作.
生成的.so有一个重定位项,用于调用ml_func2中的ml_util_func.这是ml_func2上objdump -dR -Mintel的输出：
0000050d <ml_func2>:
50d: 55 push ebp
50e: 89 e5 mov ebp,esp
510: 83 ec 14 sub esp,0x14
513: 8b 45 08 mov eax,DWORD PTR [ebp+0x8]
516: 89 04 24 mov DWORD PTR [esp],eax
519: e8 fc ff ff ff call 51a <ml_func2+0xd>
51a: R_386_PC32 ml_util_func
51e: 89 45 fc mov DWORD PTR [ebp-0x4],eax
521: 8b 45 0c mov eax,DWORD PTR [ebp+0xc]
524: 8b 55 fc mov edx,DWORD PTR [ebp-0x4]
527: 01 c2 add edx,eax
529: a1 00 00 00 00 mov eax,ds:0x0
52a: R_386_32 myglob
52e: 8d 04 02 lea eax,[edx+eax*1]
531: c9 leave
532: c3 ret
533: 90 nop
注意调用指令上的R_386_PC32重定位.
现在,我的问题是为什么需要重新安置？ e8在x86上是“call relative …”,并且由于ml_util_func是在同一个对象中定义的,因此链接器可以计算它与调用之间的相对偏移量而不将它留给动态加载器吗？
有趣的是,如果ml_util_func被声明为static,则重定位将消失,链接器将正确计算并插入偏移量.什么是导出ml_util_func导致链接器懒惰呢？
P.S.：我故意使用非PIC代码,以了解加载时重定位.
解决方法:
找不到原因,但这是binutils对此的评论：
binutils-2.11.90-20010705-src.tar.gz / bfd / elf32-i386.c：679
/* If we are creating a shared library, and this is a reloc
against a global symbol, or a non PC relative reloc
against a local symbol, then we need to copy the reloc
into the shared library. However, if we are linking with
-Bsymbolic, we do not need to copy a reloc against a
global symbol which is defined in an object we are
我认为,这个重定位是为了允许用户重载库中的任何全局符号.并且,似乎-Bsymbolic禁用此功能,并且不会从库本身生成符号的重定位.
http://www.rocketaware.com/man/man1/ld.1.htm
-Bsymbolic
This option causes all symbolic references in the output to be
resolved in this link-edit session. The only remaining run-time
relocation requirements are base-relative relocations, i.e.
translation with respect to the load address. Failure to resolve
any symbolic reference causes an error to be reported.
各种-B模式和限制(C)的更长描述如下：
http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/documentation/ss12/mr/man1/CC.1.html
-Bbinding
Specifies whether a library binding for linking is
symbolic, dynamic (shared), or static (nonshared).
-Bdynamic is the default. You can use the -B
option several times on a command line.
For more information on the -Bbinding option, see
the ld(1) man page and the Solaris documentation.
-Bdynamic directs the link editor to look for
liblib.so files. Use this option if you want
shared library bindings for linking. If the
liblib.so files are not found, it looks for
liblib.a files.
-Bstatic directs the link editor to look only for
liblib.a files. The .a suffix indicates that the
file is static, that is, nonshared. Use this
option if you want nonshared library bindings for
linking.
-Bsymbolic forces symbols to be resolved within a
shared library if possible, even when a symbol is
already defined elsewhere. For an explanation of
-Bsymbolic, see the ld(1) man page.
This option and its arguments are passed to the
linker, ld. If you compile and link in separate
steps and are using the -Bbinding option, you must
include the option in the link step.
Warning:
Never use -Bsymbolic with programs containing C++
code, use linker scoping instead. See the C++
User's Guide for more information on linker scop-
ing. See also the -xldscope option.
With -Bsymbolic, references in different modules
can bind to different copies of what is supposed
to be one global object.
The exception mechanism relies on comparing
addresses. If you have two copies of something,
their addresses won't compare equal, and the
exception mechanism can fail because the exception
mechanism relies on comparing what are supposed to
be unique addresses.
标签：linux,assembly,linker,elf,relocation 来源： https://codeday.me/bug/20190626/1294585.html