C++11:移动构造函数的测试
作者:互联网
C++11:移动构造函数的测试
代码如下:
#include <iostream> #include <stddef.h> #include <Windows.h> using namespace std; class CTest { private: std::size_t size; char* buffer; public: CTest(std::size_t size) : size(size), buffer(nullptr) { buffer = new char[size]; } ~CTest() { delete[] buffer; } CTest(const CTest& other) : size(other.size), buffer(nullptr) { buffer = new char[size]; } CTest(CTest&& other) : size(other.size), buffer(other.buffer) { other.buffer = nullptr; } }; template <typename Func> __int64 Benchmark(Func f, size_t count) { // LARGE_INTEGER m_liPerfFreq={0}; // //获取每秒多少CPU Performance Tick // QueryPerformanceFrequency(&m_liPerfFreq); LARGE_INTEGER li = {}; QueryPerformanceCounter(&li); __int64 start = li.QuadPart; f(count); QueryPerformanceCounter(&li); return (li.QuadPart - start);//* 1000 / m_liPerfFreq.QuadPart; } void Alloc_Ref(size_t count) { CTest t(1024); for(size_t i = 0; i < count; ++i) CTest c(t); } void Alloc_Move(size_t count) { CTest t(1024); for(size_t i = 0; i < count; ++i) CTest c(std::move(t)); //CTest c(CTest(1024)); } int _tmain(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[]) { for(int i= 0; i<10 ;++i) { cout << "Move: "<< Benchmark(Alloc_Move, 1000000) << " ms." << endl; cout << "Ref: " << Benchmark(Alloc_Ref, 1000000) << " ms." << endl; } system("pause"); return 0; }
程序运行结果如下:
结论:可见移动构造函数是拷贝构造函数的1-3倍。
参考链接:
VS 2010, Move constructor only reached after move() and slower than copy constructor?
标签:11,count,buffer,C++,li,other,构造函数,CTest,size 来源: https://www.cnblogs.com/2018shawn/p/10967077.html